A lot of folks have used the Spring framework to build applications - and what's not to love? It's allowed us to solve enterprise problems with a minimum of tedium. And the framework has evolved to address criticisms, for example the continued reduction in need for lengthy XML configuration in application contexts in favor of ever more terse syntax and support for code annotations.
The framework as-packaged includes facilities to help with many common aspects of contemporary application development, from a Model-View-Controller (MVC) framework to integration with persistence managers and elegant transaction management. But it doesn't necessarily cover every need. One example of a gap is batch processing.
The idea behind batch processing is to allow a program to run without the need for human intervention - this may involve solving a problem that takes a lengthy amount of time, processing a large input set, or just automating some business process that doesn't necessarily need to be triggered by a human. The batch paradigm was far more dominant in years past than it is in contemporary business computing, but that doesn't mean valid batch use cases don't continue to crop up. The operating system you're using right now likely uses a batch approach to do all sorts of things for you without bugging you about it. Enjoying those automatic backups?
So what if you've got a problem that calls for a batch style solution but you'd still like to use Spring? On a recent project, we realized that much of the business logic we'd just finished writing within a web service framed with Spring could be reused for an upcoming batch component (which involved processing a potentially very large XML document that would be uploaded by a business partner). We briefly considered rolling a separate application that reused some of the same code, but before we went down that road someone mentioned hearing of "Spring Batch" - something that was not a part of Spring proper, but an auxiliary framework meant to complement it.
As you can read on its home page,
Spring Batch builds upon the productivity, POJO-based development approach, and general ease of use capabilities people have come to know from the Spring Framework, while making it easy for developers to access and leverage more advanced enterprise services when necessary.
Sounds great! So I dove in and started learning more about it. As I read the documentation, however, I have to admit I got a little overwhelmed by the complexity and amount of configuration needed for even a simple example. Unlike your average Spring application context, the context of a Spring Batch application grows pretty quick and involves configuring a lot of stuff that, at the outset, it just doesn't seem like you should need to configure. A "job repository" to track the status and history of job executions, which itself requires a data source - just to get started? Wow, that's a bit heavy handed. Worried that I might be misunderstanding what I'd found, I did some searching and found that I wasn't alone in thinking the API left something to be desired.
But I'm not going to get as down on Spring Batch as the author of the article I just linked to. The reason being - once I determined what we had to configure in order to get a functional batch job running, I discussed the components involved with my team members and our client and we realized we would appreciate having all of those things. Logged history of batch runs in a database would be good, especially if there were ever a problem or failure. Then our client asked - will we have a UI to control it if we need to?
Enter Spring Batch Admin. It's unfortunate that the Admin capability is distributed separately from Spring Batch itself - because unless you hear about it or search with the right query, you might wind up rolling your own administrative UI unnecessarily. Of course you can write your own if you'd like - especially if you need to fit in with some pre-existing administrative app you may already have in place - but chances are you have better things to do and batch processing is just one portion of your project.
I've got a very important time-saving tip if you think you'd like to use the Admin UI, though: decide if you need it first before starting to develop your batch capability. I made the mistake of thinking it would be easier to get our batch capability working headlessly first, then bolt the Admin app onto the project, in an attempt to reduce complexity and break things down. Instead I wound up having to redo some of the POJOs and configuration involved in kicking off jobs to make what I'd done compatible with the Admin framework. In fact, starting with the Admin framework, and getting it up and running with its ability to run abstract jobs first, then customizing the jobs to meet your needs, would be the path of least resistance.
Once I had everything together, though, what a sweet capability this added up to! Using Spring Batch plus Spring Batch Admin gave my team a relatively low-overhead solution that allowed us to easily hand batch testing duties over to our client - all they had to know how to do was access a web page and click a button. Plus, we've given them a framework and a concrete example that is now easily repeatable - given a few POJOs and some copy/paste/modify of the application context XML, they could easily add new batch job types in the future.